This collection provides an implementation of the EcmaScript language
For license information, please see the file COPYING.LIB.
command-line with `planet -i' (see the PLaneT command-line tool docs).
Sorry I don't have any high-level documentation yet. Have you looked
at ECMA-262 Edition 3?
KNOWN LIMITATIONS ==============================================================
Likely to be fixed eventually:
- `eval' is not yet implemented
- the `toString' method for functions doesn't produce their source yet
- variables bound in `catch' clauses probably don't work right
underneath `with' statements
- semantics of exceptions is probably not quite right (cf. the subtle
issue of try-finally with no catch and a return in the finally)
- standard library virtually non-existent
- proper tail recursion is not yet implemented
- needs lots more unit tests
- `let' doesn't work anymore
- nested `with' statements are broken
Unlikely to be fixed any time soon:
- numbers are probably not entirely faithful to spec
- regular expressions don't yet work at all
- there are absolutely no compiler optimizations yet -- should be
DESIGN DECISIONS ===============================================================
REF TYPE: no expressions ever evaluate to refs at runtime. The spec
allows for the *possibility* that some implementations may allow
arbitrary expressions (particularly function calls) to evaluate to
refs, which means that all evaluation points that expect non-ref
values must explicitly dereference their inputs. But the spec does not
*require* an implementation to allow for this possibility. In the
interest of both a more efficient evaluation model and one which more
closely matches that of Scheme (the target of the compiler), only
those syntactic forms that explicitly produce references (variable
references, object property references, and computed object property
references) may be used on the left-hand side of an assignment. All
other expression forms appearing on the left-hand side of an
assignment are treated as compile-time errors.
BINDINGS AND `with': code that does not syntactically occur underneath
the `with' form is compiled to a much more efficient form that closely
matches Scheme's binding forms: almost all variables are lexically
scoped, with the notable exception of top-level bindings, which are
looked up dynamically in the global object. The compilation of `with'
is still faithful to the spec, but it results in much more inefficient
code: when evaluating the body of a `with' statement, the entire
lexical environment is copied into a runtime scope chain which
correctly contains the given object as a frame. Subsequent variable
references that syntactically occur within that `with' form are looked
up dynamically in this scope chain.
RELEASE HISTORY ================================================================
New implementation of binding: no more evaluating to refs!
Nested `with' forms are broken.
Binding arrows are broken for top-level.
Got rid of unnecessary PLTCOLLECTS hack for testing.
Fixed bugs in sexp and pretty-print due to changed AST types.
Hoisting for ES4 `let' corrected.
Drastically improved binding implementation.
Addressed serious bugs in implementation of functions.
Began implementation for debug console (still disabled).
Added newly required `capability-value' to language level interface.
Bug fixed for pretty-printer (thanks to Jay).
Serialized language level settings.
(Internally: hoisting for ES4 `let' in place.)
Implements most of ECMA-262 Edition 3.
Lack of regular expressions
Lack of standard library
No reflection or function reification